JK News Today
Srinagar, November 03:


The People’s Alliance for Gupkar Declaration today rejected the official version on the new land laws in J&K, and contested all the clarifications that the government had given on Monday.


Using strong words, the Alliance said, the official version in which it was stated that there was no room for misgivings as 90 percent of land will stay with natives only , was “ to hoodwink the people.”
The Gupkar Alliance , a conglomerate of six Kashmir centric parties, committed to reversal of the abrogation of Article 370 and restoration of statehood for J&K , in a statement on Tuesday questioned the official version said that the official statement was “ misleading “.

The PAGD termed the land laws regime of Jammu and Kashmir as most progressive, pro people and pro former in entire Indian Subcontinent. The statement adds that “ the real object of repeal of the basic land laws and massive amendments to the other laws is to push in and implement the agenda of effecting demographic change and disempowering the people of Jammu and Kashmir.”
“Jammu and Kashmir was first in the Country to implement the concept of “land to tiller “ by enacting Big Landed Estates Abolition Act 1952 followed by Agrarian Reforms Act 1976 restricting the land holding to twelve and half acres and ending the exploitative practice of “ absentee landlordism” and whosoever calls it archaic would be guilty of ignorance of the history of Jammu and Kashmir. It is because of the timely land reforms that there are no starvation deaths occur in Jammu and Kashmir, no farmers suicides have been ever reported from Jammu and Kashmir and everyone in Jammu and Kashmir has available three fundamental necessities- food, clothing and shelter, the position that is now sought to be reversed by making massive assault on the land law regime.”

The statement ask as to how can Alienation of Land Act be termed as archaic when it prohibited transfer of land to a non State Subject thus protecting the interests of Permanent Residents of Jammu and Kashmir and at the same time made a provision for transfer of land by mortgage to organisations like Industrial Development Bank of India, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India to keep pace with industrial development. “The repeal of the Act now allows the land to be transferred to non State Subjects, denuding the residents of Jammu and Kashmir of their most precious rights. The claimed protection of rights in agricultural land, it is stated, is mere eyewash as the amendment introduced in Land Revenue Act provides for permission to sell the agricultural land almost at mere asking without difficulty. The abolition of Big Landed Estates Abolition Act 1952 and amendments in Agrarian Reforms Act 1976 is against farmers and to remove the ceiling on acquisition. The changes in Development Act and creation of “security zones” to avoid adherence to the rules and regulations as regards construction activities in such zones and exclusion of oversight by expert bodies, environmental activists and civil society groups is bound to put at peril ecosystem in fragile environmental areas like Gulmarg, Pahalgam and Sonamarg already under pressure beyond their carrying capacity.”

“The laws now introduced through amendments are not only against people of Jammu and Kashmir but undemocratic, unconstitutional and backward looking with only aim to disempower people and change the demography.”